FINA | mesto      | točke | ime | disc. | čas |
1.      | 0794 |     100PZ |
    1:09,24 | |
2.      | 0757 |     200KZ |
    2:03,95 | |
3.      | 0755 |     200KZ |
    2:04,07 | |
4.      | 0742 |     100KZ |
    0:57,11 | |
5.      | 0737 |     200PZ |
    2:33,77 | |
6.      | 0733 |     100KZ |
    0:57,35 | |
7.      | 0729 |     200MZ |
    2:20,11 | |
8.      | 0699 |     200KM |
    1:54,90 | |
9.      | 0697 |     100KZ |
    0:58,31 | |
10.      | 0693 |     200KM |
    1:55,25 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
       ![]()         ![]()         ![]()         ![]()         ![]()         ![]()         ![]()         ![]()         ![]()         ![]()         ![]() |
mesto |
ime |
letnik |
klub |
čas |
točke |
1.      | 2001 | FR | 2:03,95 | 757 |               (1:58,38; -4.49%) | 2.      | 2001 | BM | 2:04,07 | 755 |               (1:58,86; -4.19%) | 1.      | 2003 | BM | 2:09,08 | 670 |               (2:07,14; -1.5%) | 2.      | 2004 | IL | 2:10,14 | 654 |               (2:09,08; -0.81%) | 3.      | 2003 | LL | 2:12,65 | 617 |               (2:08,58; -3.06%) | 1.      | 2006 | IL | 2:12,78 | 616 |               (2:12,64; -0.1%) | 4.      | 2003 | LL | 2:13,00 | 612 |    os.rek. (2:13,25; 0.18%) | 2.      | 2006 | RAD | 2:13,38 | 607 |               (2:08,85; -3.39%) | 5.      | 2003 | LL | 2:13,43 | 607 |               (2:10,55; -2.15%) | 6.      | 2004 | NC | 2:15,71 | 576 |               (2:08,08; -5.62%) |
  |   |   |   |   | 7.      | 2004 | OL | 2:16,83 | 562 |               (2:11,86; -3.63%) | 3.      | 2006 | LL | 2:16,94 | 561 |    os.rek. (2:18,57; 1.19%) | 8.      | 2004 | NC | 2:17,66 | 552 |               (2:15,94; -1.24%) | 4.      | 2005 | OL | 2:17,71 | 552 |    os.rek. (2:18,83; 0.81%) | 5.      | 2005 | TK | 2:18,03 | 548 |               (2:14,63; -2.46%) | 6.      | 2006 | TK | 2:19,05 | 536 |               (2:18,23; -0.58%) | 9.      | 2004 | IL | 2:20,08 | 524 |               (2:15,63; -3.17%) | 9.      | 2003 | OL | 2:20,08 | 524 |               (2:18,66; -1.01%) | 7.      | 2006 | OL | 2:20,77 | 516 |    os.rek. (2:25,79; 3.56%) | 8.      | 2006 | RAD | 2:22,67 | 496 |    os.rek. (2:22,68; 0%) |
  |   |   |   |   | 9.      | 2006 | LL | 2:22,68 | 496 |    os.rek. (2:24,99; 1.61%) | 10.      | 2006 | NC | 2:23,69 | 486 |               (2:22,29; -0.97%) | 11.      | 2006 | KA | 2:23,90 | 483 |               (2:15,51; -5.83%) | 12.      | 2006 | OL | 2:24,10 | 481 |    os.rek. (2:25,76; 1.15%) | 13.      | 2006 | TK | 2:24,68 | 476 |               (2:23,08; -1.1%) | 14.      | 2006 | RR | 2:25,01 | 472 |    os.rek. (2:26,25; 0.85%) | 15.      | 2005 | RAD | 2:25,53 | 467 |               (2:19,77; -3.95%) | 16.      | 2006 | SDD | 2:26,14 | 462 |               (2:25,56; -0.39%) | 17.      | 2006 | RL | 2:26,50 | 458 |               (2:23,46; -2.07%) | 18.      | 2006 | FR | 2:27,65 | 448 |    os.rek. (2:37,48; 6.65%) |
  |   |   |   |   | 11.      | 2004 | NG | 2:27,97 | 445 |    os.rek. (2:32,63; 3.14%) | 12.      | 2004 | OL | 2:28,28 | 442 |               (2:14,99; -8.96%) | 3.      | 2002 | OL | 2:28,43 | 441 |               (2:20,76; -5.16%) | 13.      | 2004 | BM | 2:29,53 | 431 |    os.rek. (2:35,15; 3.75%) | 19.      | 2005 | PDM | 2:29,70 | 429 |    os.rek. (2:30,32; 0.41%) | 20.      | 2006 | TK | 2:29,80 | 429 |    os.rek. (2:33,72; 2.61%) | 14.      | 2003 | NG | 2:30,42 | 423 |    os.rek. (2:32,06; 1.09%) | 21.      | 2006 | TK | 2:32,38 | 407 |               (2:32,18; -0.13%) | 22.      | 2005 | KA | 2:32,58 | 405 |    os.rek. (2:50,09; 11.47%) | 15.      | 2004 | OL | 2:35,10 | 386 |    os.rek. (2:36,37; 0.81%) |
  |   |   |   |   | 16.      | 2004 | NC | 2:35,45 | 383 |               (2:33,14; -1.48%) | 23.      | 2006 | TK | 2:35,49 | 383 |    os.rek. (2:36,66; 0.75%) | 24.      | 2006 | BM | 2:36,09 | 379 |    os.rek. (2:44,63; 5.47%) | 17.      | 2004 | NC | 2:38,99 | 358 |    os.rek. (2:41,84; 1.79%) | 18.      | 2004 | OL | 2:40,19 | 350 |               (2:31,69; -5.3%) | 25.      | 2006 | CK | 2:43,07 | 332 |               (2:33,27; -6%) | 4.      | 2002 | NG | 2:47,21 | 308 |    os.rek. (2:53,32; 3.65%) | 5.      | 2002 | IL | 2:50,62 | 290 |    os.rek. (3:22,74; 18.82%) | 26.      | 2006 | IL | 2:58,43 | 253 |               (2:53,51; -2.75%) |